Title ix Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Title ix - Research Paper ExampleFurthermore, while Title IX legitimately prohibits discriminatory practices in state funded programs, it does not order the maintenance of strict ratio between the proportions the two genders in the institutions athletic programs and its scholar body (Cohen v. Brown University). Furthermore, as far as the scope of Title IX is concerned, academic institutions have had to make tough decisions regarding which athletics programs fall within the scope of this law. The existing state of sports budget was such that in most institutions, the largest part of sports budgets were allocated to custodys athletics which did not reflect the percentage of men in the school-age child body (Cohen v. Brown University).Keeping in view the above confusion, a law was passed in 1984 with respect to Title IX. In 1984 the U.S controlling Court had passed the law that Title IX applied exclusively to those programs that were funded by state money (Cohen v. Brown Universit y). This law was enforced in the context of woodlet vs. City Bell (which shall be discussed later). This implied that discrimination was not illegal in activities or programs that were not funded by state money. This means that discrimination on the floor of gender in athletic sports would not be considered unlawful because very few of such programs are funded by the state or have money allocated specifically for them. Additionally, athletic programs can be considered as subunits of an institutions programs that receive state money for a wide range of reasons including funds for construction, student aids, feeding programs and research grants.The first case to be analyzed is the case of United States vs. Virginia. The Virginia Military Institute (VMI) has been noted for its lack of co-education and being an exclusively anthropoid undergraduate institute. This institution was sued by the United States with the argument that exclusive admissions to males were unconstitutional. This stance